Covid 19 could be viewed as an exercise in individual vs. collective autonomy or sovereignty. Normally, in the case of a pandemic, it would make sense for collective sovereignty. Where everyone would willingly comply and take the vaccine. But the reality is that governments, institutions, and the controlled media are not trustworthy. Gates' control of the WHO and other institutions, Fauci's control of the NIAID and range of influence with gain of function experiments, etc, etc. The questionable validity of the pcr test, the dubious death counts ascribed to
covid 19, the elimination of Hydroxychloride and Ivermectin, Gate's immediate goal to vaccinate the entire world's population were all tipoffs that aspects around Covid 19 were highly suspicious.
Most everyone, I imagine, knows that the media is centralized, controlled by the oligarchs and the CIA. The government has lied many times to the public for, forever it seems. Why do people continue to believe in and put their faith in them? I for one, and most of the many others who refused to get vaccinated or have the pcr test are people who are very skeptical about anything that the media or the government puts out. That is the simple reason. We were hated and vilified because of the idea that we were not willing to protect humanity by agreeing to "collective sovereignty". This would be fair, if it was a level playing field and everything was above board. But those who believed in the altruism of getting vaxxed ignored the long history of lying, tyrannical governments and how the media is propaganda. How could people be so naive?
The collusion of the government, the media, the social media, Big Pharm, has been revealed. Censorship was permitted as though government could declare what is true and what isn't, which is obviously the tool of the tyrant, and contrary to democracy. The democrats and the left aligned with the oligarchs and Noam Chomsky missed a golden opportunity to lead his followers toward individual sovereignty. How could he of all people put his trust in the government and its media? And the right stood up against the mandate, the lies, and the tyranny. What a surprise. I have always been an extreme leftist, but now I don't wish to identify with any political party. They seem irrelevant, and would best be ignored.
When the institutions, governments, media, pharmaceuticals, etc. are dishonest, collective autonomy makes no sense. All those who so proudly got jabbed, lacked the clarity to see that collective autonomy which can never be good if the people at the top are dishonest and tyrannical. And to follow their directives, is very sheepish behavior.
Creating an existential dilemma whereby there is a hidden directive to either agree to collective sovereignty/autonomy or be dismissed for not thinking of working for the whole, when it was simply people choosing individual sovereignty because they could not put their faith in the government, especially allowing them to violate our bodies with out our permission when they mandated the vaccine, was a very clever manipulaton.. Working for the whole is beautiful, but in this case, it's a trap.
Hi Tom,
I clicked over from Dr. Malones stack because while interested in these subjects, I cannot comment there without being a paid subscriber. Recent events have laid bare characteristics of long established structures. When young many years were spent trying to answer one question. What is the root source of societal and individual dysfunction? When the 'answer' was found, it was so simple I figured that other people, far more smart than I, would pick up on it and I could add my two cents to the mix. It never happened, in the meantime a 'training' system was developed to wean myself away from current ways of understanding things. I realized that the 'answer' could not easily gain traction because it refutes a false assumption held in common by both sides of societal divides. It is in the nature of a dominant narrative to span pretty much all communities. Even those who reject common beliefs speak in terms set by the dominant narrative. The false assumption is that the spiritual and the material are fundamentally different, the answer is to suggest they are the same thing. Basically, we miss out and do not recognize many ways that the subtle becomes gross. (Through ones heart connection to Source, for one way) In my opinion consciousness evolves collectively so I am a horizontalist, but am not confident of breaking the narrative wall that currently defines limits to consciousness, given that the self identity and egos of pretty much everybody has been created by this (pretty much unacknowledged) narrative.
Good luck in your efforts, but I will say, the gaslighting is thick and many good people still fall for the tricks.
Thanks Sounder for your comment. My own spiritual path has brought me to the realization that in essence, I am not a thing (nothing). I am a verb, and the verb is love.
It seems to me that what we see on the outside is what is reflected from the inside. That is, we are either coming from the ego-mind, or from the heart (caring). This dichotomy that exists in everyone is mirrored throughout history. Unfortunately, those coming from the ego will kill to dominate others, while those coming from the heart, prefer only to kill in self-defense.